Ventura
Church of Christ
Exploratory Building Committee
Main purpose – to give the elders a detailed report; after exploring
all expressed suggestions for a new building or for renovations to existing
building.
Plans fail
for lack of counsel, but with many advisors they succeed –
Proverbs 15:22
“For I
know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and
not to harm you, plans to give you and a future.” - Jeremiah29:11
HOW
WE GOT THE COMMITTEE
In
May 2004, elders of the Ventura Church of Christ began looking at needed
repairs and improvements to the current infrastructure, including the buildings
and parking lot. By June 2004,
deteriorating conditions required spending $29,000 for a new roof on the
education building. By August, it was
apparent other repairs were drastically needed and would run at least $67,000,
with actual costs likely to run well over $100,000.
In September 2004, a proposal was presented to the elders to form an exploratory building committee consisting of Ventura members, to review and assess options, determine the costs and report their findings. A charter was approved, and the group started conducting scheduled open meetings in October 2004. The group held 16 meetings, with the average meeting lasting about 1.5 hours.
COMMITTEE
MEMBERS
Tyler
Yager, vice chairman Karl McDonald, recorder
Scott
Ball Marty Davis Joe Flynt Ivan Lesley
Kathie
Michaud Sean Michaud Phillip Mullins Nolan Weir
PROCEEDURE
The
committee requested and got input from all areas of ministry here at
Ventura. Those inputs led us to compile
a list of 43 separate objectives, ranging from more rest rooms to a larger
fellowship area. These objectives would
later be used to help grade each potential proposal.
Some
of these objectives were very unique for a church. For example, we have budgeted money to have a baptistery capable
of serving anyone in a wheel chair. In
addition, the kitchen will focus more on warming food than cooking a meal from
scratch, to better accommodate the nurture group luncheons.
Other
items were considered for practical value, such as using durable, washable
materials for the walls.
The
most important objectives were to improve the morale of the congregation and
come up with a building that could be used as a tool to spread the Gospel.
After
compiling the objectives, the committee came up with five options for
consideration.
1.
Build new
facility on existing land; use none of existing facilities; remove old buildings
2.
Build new
facility on existing land; use some of old facilities and remove others
3.
Build
supplemental classrooms, offices and storage and use all existing facilities
AND
4.
Sell all land
and buildings currently owned AND
5.
Renovate
existing facilities as little as possible to meet bare minimum needs
FINDINGS
OF THE COMMITTEE
During
our research and planning, we realized two of the options were so close to not
warrant a separate vote on each one. Of
the three final options, one was voted unanimously as the most favorable.
The
final options involved the following:
Selling
the current property and buying an existing structure.
The
empty Albertson’s store was examined, and the final cost to the congregation
would be $1,850,000. This option met all
of our objectives, but was voted our third choice.
Renovating
existing facilities
Renovating
the current buildings including the mold in the education building due to the
extensive water leaks, which, according to the insurance adjuster, were caused by
years of condensation buildup as well as the water leaks we experienced during
the problems with the roof. This option
would cost approximately $516,000. This
option did not meet several of the objectives and was rated second of the three
by the committee.
Sell all land and buildings and build to
suit
The
option selected to recommend is to sell the existing land, expecting to net
$1,700,000. We would then buy a new
parcel of land, and build a new building, parking lot and other items needed
for a place of worship. After all costs
were totaled, this would cost just over $1.5 million, leaving us with a surplus
of about $160,000. Because this option
met our objectives and provided a surplus, it was voted our first choice.
CONCLUSION
The
committee votes were unanimous to sell the existing land and buildings and
build to suit.
The
recommendation was presented to the deacons, and their vote was unanimous in
agreement with the committee.
The
recommendation was presented to the congregation, and their vote was unanimous
in agreement with the committee.
Remember
that this building has been a blessing to this congregation. The body of Christ has worshipped here for
more than 30 years. We’ve had weddings,
funerals, baptisms, dinners, classes and parties, all here within these
walls.
God
is blessing us once again. If Wal-Mart
had built their store as little as a mile away in either direction, this
property wouldn’t be worth as much as it is now. We would still have a very deteriorated and deteriorating
building, but we would not have the option of selling it for enough money to
build another one.
We
have Biblical examples of how God wants his people to deal with blessings:
After
asking for deliverance, God gave the children of Israel what they asked by
sending them Moses. But they never saw
the Promised Land because they mumbled, grumbled and stumbled. In Numbers 32, we see that God took his
blessing away from them and gave it to their children.
The
one-talent man in Matthew 25 did nothing with what he had been given, out of
fear. He lost that talent, and it was
given to someone who had proven he knew how to use it.
On
the other hand, we have the example of the two-talent and five-talent men. They took what they had been given, and used
it to make more.
In
Acts 8, the church was under a great persecution. However, the faith of those Christians led them to teach the
Gospel wherever they went as they fled this oppression, and they turned it into
a great victory for Christ and his church.
Pray
and seriously consider this opportunity that God has given to us as we work
toward our concerted goal.